4.6 Article

Iron incorporation affecting the structure and boosting catalytic activity of β-Co(OH)2: exploring the reaction mechanism of ultrathin two-dimensional carbon-free Fe3O4-decorated β-Co(OH)2 nanosheets as efficient oxygen evolution electrocatalysts

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 15, 页码 6849-6859

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6ta10902k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [21575090]
  2. Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation [2162009]
  3. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [CITTCD201504072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is significantly important to develop highly active catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for designing various renewable energy storage and conversion devices. Herein, we report a series of ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) carbon-free Fe3O4-decorated beta-Co(OH)(2) nanosheets (Fe3O4/Co(OH)(2) NSs) as OER electrocatalysts with different Co/Fe mole ratios from 1 to 31. It is found that the different amounts of iron incorporation into Co(OH)(2) NSs affects the structure of Fe3O4/Co(OH)(2) NSs, while the optimized incorporation boosts the electrocatalytic activity of Co(OH)(2) NSs for OER, i.e. the Fe3O4/Co(OH)(2) NSs with a Co/Fe molar ratio of 15 demonstrate superior catalytic properties with respect to the lowest overpotential and smallest Tafel slope in alkaline media. First principles calculations used for exploring mechanisms show that Fe3+ from Fe3O4/Co(OH)(2) NSs adsorbs water molecules more energetically favorably on the surface and would offer far more improvement of the catalytic activity compared with Fe2+. Combined with structure analysis and calculation results, the better catalytic activity is attributed to the ultrathin structure, high active site exposure, lower adsorption energy towards water molecules and the increased positive charge of adsorbed water molecules. This research paves a way to develop highly active and durable substitutes for noble metal OER electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据