4.6 Article

Hierarchical NiCoP nanocone arrays supported on Ni foam as an efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 5, 期 28, 页码 14828-14837

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta03947f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21571080, 10604020]
  2. Special program of international science and technology cooperation projects of China [2014DFR61140]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin province [20170101193JC]
  4. National long-term project of Thousand Talents Plan of Bureau of Foreign Experts Affairs of People's Republic of China [WQ20142200205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Design of cost-effective, highly efficient and stable bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting is necessary for renewable energy systems. In this study, NiCoP nanowire arrays grown on 3D Ni foam (NiCoP NWAs/NF) were successfully synthesized by a two-step method, which were developed as novel bifunctional electrocatalysts for evaluating in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Their special cone nanostructure and bifunctional crystal structure enable the electrocatalysts to display remarkable electrocatalytic performance and stability for OER and HER (maintained for 28 h in the long-term HER and OER stability test with slight attenuation). The electrodes have very low overpotentials of 197 mV and 370 mV for HER and OER in 1.0 M KOH at a high current density of 100 mA cm(-2), respectively. All the merits can be attributed to several parameters: the inherent nature of transition metal phosphides, the presence of a bimetal synergetic effect, special morphology design, and the formation of secondary electrocatalysts on the surface of NiCoP. Meanwhile, the excellent bifunctional electrocatalysts can be developed as both anode and cathode of an alkaline electrolyzer (1.0 M KOH) which needs a cell voltage of 1.64 V to achieve 20 mA cm(-2) current density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据