4.4 Article

Health Literacy among Medically Underserved: The Role of Demographic Factors, Social Influence, and Religious Beliefs

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 923-931

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1377322

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities at the National Cancer Institute [1U54 CA153509]
  2. National Cancer Institute [R25CA090314]
  3. Biostatistics Core
  4. Survey Methods Core at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center (NIH/NCI) [P30-CA076292]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study examined the sociodemographic and psychosocial variables that predicted being at risk for low health literacy among a population of racially and ethnically diverse patients accessing primary care services at community-based clinics. Participants (N=416) were aged 50-75 years, currently not up-to-date with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, at average CRC risk, and enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed at promoting CRC screening. Participants completed a baseline interview that assessed health literacy as measured by Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised, sociodemographic factors, and psychosocial variables (e.g., health beliefs) prior to randomization and receipt of an intervention. Thirty-six percent of the participants were found to be at risk for low health literacy. Sociodemographic and psychosocial variables were assessed as predictors of being at risk for low health literacy using logistic regression. In the final model, predictors were male gender, being from a racial/ethnic minority group, being unable to work, having higher social influence scores, and having higher religious belief scores. These findings suggest several patient characteristics that may be associated with low health literacy, and highlight the importance of supporting all patients through simplified and clear communications and information to improve understanding of CRC screening information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据