3.8 Review

Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Emmer Wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank): a Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 117-134

出版社

UNIV ZAGREB, FAC AGRICULTURE
DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1871

关键词

chemical composition; emmer wheat; nutritional value; Triticum dicoccon Schrank

资金

  1. project ITEBIO Support and innovations of a special and organic products technologies for human healthy nutrition under Operational Programme Research and Development [ITMS: 26 220 220 115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cereals represent the most important group of crops in the structure of plant production from the economic and agronomic point of view. Cereals are widely consumed and are a valuable sources of delivering components with biological activity to humans. They are one of the most abundant sources of protein and energy and are consumed as bread - a major staple food - in most countries throughout the world. The cultivated hulled wheats emmer, einkorn, and spelt, are among the most ancient Triticeae cultivated in the world and have long represented a staple food. However, the move in recent years toward more natural foods and sustainable agriculture and the rediscovery of ancient foods and flavours have brought renewed interest in these neglected species. Emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccon Schrank) is rich in resistant starch, minerals, fibre, carotenoids, antioxidant compounds, and poor in fats; it has been recognized as a very healthy cereal and is recommended in the diet for people suffering from allergies, colitis, diabetes and high blood cholesterol. For these reasons, research activities and selection programs are being conducted to assess the genetic, agronomic, nutritional and technological properties of emmer wheat. The main results of studies and the knowledge acquired about the chemical and nutritional composition (protein content, digestible carbohydrates, dietary fibre, lipids, vitamins, and minerals) are reviewed in this paper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据