4.2 Article

Stratified, precision or personalised medicine? Cancer services in the real world' of a London hospital

期刊

SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 143-158

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12457

关键词

UK; personalised medicine; breast cancer; ethnography; stratification; healthcare markets

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research BioMedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London
  2. Imperial College Healthcare Charity
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0513-10057] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted ethnographic research in collaboration with a large, research-intensive London breast cancer service in 2013-2014 so as to understand the practices and potential effects of stratified medicine. Stratified medicine is often seen as a synonym for both personalised and precision medicine but these three terms, we found, also related to distinct facets of treatment and care. Personalised medicine is the term adopted for the developing 2016 NHS England Strategy, in which breast cancer care is considered a prime example of improved biological precision and better patient outcomes. We asked how this biologically stratified medicine affected wider relations of care and treatment. We interviewed formally 33 patients and 23 of their carers, including healthcare workers; attended meetings associated with service improvements, medical decision-making, public engagement, and scientific developments as well as following patients through waiting rooms, clinical consultations and other settings. We found that the translation of new protocols based on biological research introduced further complications into an already-complex patient pathway. Combinations of new and historic forms of stratification had an impact on almost all patients, carers and staff, resulting in care that often felt less rather than more personal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据