4.4 Article

Flavor gauge models below the Fermi scale

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2017)096

关键词

Beyond Standard Model; Gauge Symmetry; Kaon Physics; Neutrino Physics

资金

  1. KITP Santa Barbara (National Science Foundation) [PHY11-25915]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy [de-sc0010108, DE-AC02-76SF00515, de-sc0013699]
  3. EU [H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015/674896-Elusives, H2020-MSCA-2015-690575-InvisiblesPlus]
  4. Fermi Research Alliance, LLC [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0013699] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mass and weak interaction eigenstates for the quarks of the third generation are very well aligned, an empirical fact for which the Standard Model offers no explanation. We explore the possibility that this alignment is due to an additional gauge symmetry in the third generation. Specifically, we construct and analyze an explicit, renormalizable model with a gauge boson, X, corresponding to the B - L symmetry of the third family. Having a relatively light (in the MeV to multi-GeV range), flavor-nonuniversal gauge boson results in a variety of constraints from different sources. By systematically analyzing 20 different constraints, we identify the most sensitive probes: kaon, B+, D+ and Upsilon decays, D - (D) over bar (0) mixing, atomic parity violation, and neutrino scattering and oscillations. For the new gauge coupling gX in the range (10(-2) 10(-4)) the model is shown to be consistent with the data. Possible ways of testing the model in b physics, top and Z decays, direct collider production and neutrino oscillation experiments, where one can observe nonstandard matter effects, are outlined. The choice of leptons to carry the new force is ambiguous, resulting in additional phenomenological implications, such as nonuniversality in semileptonic bottom decays. The proposed framework provides interesting connections between neutrino oscillations, flavor and collider physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据