4.4 Article

Probing gluon saturation with next-to-leading order photon production at central rapidities in proton-nucleus collisions

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2017)115

关键词

Heavy Ion Phenomenology; NLO Computations

资金

  1. European Union [291823, 48]
  2. MEXT-KAKENHI [15H03652, 15K13479]
  3. DOE [DE-SC0012704]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics
  5. HZZO [8799]
  6. DFG Collaborative Research Centre (ISOQUANT) [SFB 1225]
  7. Excellence Initiative of Heidelberg University
  8. Extreme Matter Institute (EMMI)
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K13479, 15H03652] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute the cross section for photons emitted from sea quarks in protonnucleus collisions at collider energies. The computation is performed within the dilute-dense kinematics of the Color Glass Condensate (CGC) effective field theory. Albeit the result obtained is formally at next-to-leading order in the CGC power counting, it provides the dominant contribution for central rapidities. We observe that the inclusive photon cross section is proportional to all-twist Wilson line correlators in the nucleus. These correlators also appear in quark-pair production; unlike the latter, photon production is insensitive to hadronization uncertainties and therefore more sensitive to multi-parton correlations in the gluon saturation regime of QCD. We demonstrate that k(perpendicular to) and collinear factorized expressions for inclusive photon production are obtained as leading twist approximations to our result. In particular, the collinearly factorized expression is directly sensitive to the nuclear gluon distribution at small x. Other results of interest include the realization of the Low-Burnett-Kroll soft photon theorem in the CGC framework and a comparative study of how the photon amplitude is obtained in Lorenz and light-cone gauges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据