3.8 Proceedings Paper

XOOM: An End-User Development Tool for Web-Based Wearable Immersive Virtual Tours

期刊

WEB ENGINEERING (ICWE 2017)
卷 10360, 期 -, 页码 507-519

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60131-1_36

关键词

Wearable Immersive Virtual Reality; Head-Mounted Display; 360 degrees videos; Virtual tour; End user development; Therapy; Neurodevelopmental disorder; Children

资金

  1. TIM/Telecom Italia, under the PhD Grant Internet of Products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

XOOM is a novel interactive tool that allows non ICT-specialists to create web-based applications of Wearable Immersive Virtual Reality (WIVR) technology that use 360 degrees realistic videos as interactive virtual tours. These applications are interesting for various domains that range from gaming, entertainment, cultural heritage, and tourism to education, professional training, therapy and rehabilitation. 360 degrees interactive videos are displayed on smartphones placed on head-mounted VR viewers. Users explore the virtual environment and interact with active elements through head direction and movements. The virtual scenarios can be seen also on external displays (e.g., TV monitors or projections) to enable other users to participate in the experience, and to control the VR space if needed, e.g., for education, training or therapy purposes. XOOM provides the functionality to create applications of this kind, import 360 degrees videos, concatenate them, and superimpose active elements on the virtual scenes, so that the resulting environment is more interactive and is customized to the requirement of a specific domain and user target. XOOM also supports automatic data gathering and visualizations (e.g., through heat-maps) of the users' experience, which can be inspected for analytics purposes, as well as for user evaluation (e.g., in education, training, or therapy contexts). The paper describes the design and implementation of XOOM, and reports a case study in the therapeutic context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据