3.8 Proceedings Paper

Variation Robust Cross-Modal Metric Learning for Caricature Recognition

出版社

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3126686.3126736

关键词

Caricature recognition; metric learning; cross modal; feature extraction

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61432008, 61673203]
  2. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [YESS 20160035]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Novel Software Technology and Industrialization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a variation robust cross-modal metric learning (VR-(CML)-L-2) method is proposed for caricature recognition. The goal of caricature recognition is to match a caricature with a photo. This recognition process needs to deal with all kind of variations including different modalities, facial appearance exaggerations, changes in viewpoint, expression, and illumination, etc. All these variations lead to severe misalignment between features of caricatures and photos. To deal with these problems, a specifically designed facial landmark based feature extraction scheme is proposed, where features of caricatures and photos are extracted using different feature extraction steps. At each facial landmark, features of photos are extracted with fixed viewing angle and scale, while features of caricatures are extracted with different scales and viewing angles. To measure the similarity of these features, multiple cross-modal metrics are learned at different facial landmarks in one optimization framework to guarantee global optimum. As the measured features are from two modalities (caricature and photo), cross-modal metric is used to remove modality variations. Pooling at distance level is used during metric optimization to further align the features of caricatures and photos. The introduced pooling step makes the learning method more robust to variations. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method on two caricature datasets with various variations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据