4.7 Article

Urolithin B, a newly identified regulator of skeletal muscle mass

期刊

JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE
卷 8, 期 4, 页码 583-597

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12190

关键词

Polyphenols; Hypertrophy; Androgen receptor; mTORC1 signalling

资金

  1. PROCELL nutrition sprl
  2. Walloon region of Belgium
  3. United States Department of Agriculture ARS Specific Cooperative agreement [58-6408-2-0009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The control of muscle size is an essential feature of health. Indeed, skeletal muscle atrophy leads to reduced strength, poor quality of life, and metabolic disturbances. Consequently, strategies aiming to attenuate muscle wasting and to promote muscle growth during various (pathological) physiological states like sarcopenia, immobilization, malnutrition, or cachexia are needed to address this extensive health issue. In this study, we tested the effects of urolithin B, an ellagitannin-derived metabolite, on skeletal muscle growth. Methods C2C12 myotubes were treated with 15 mu M of urolithin B for 24 h. For in vivo experiments, mice were implanted with mini-osmotic pumps delivering continuously 10 mu g/day of urolithin B during 28 days. Muscle atrophy was studied in mice with a sciatic nerve denervation receiving urolithin B by the same way. Results Our experiments reveal that urolithin B enhances the growth and differentiation of C2C12 myotubes by increasing protein synthesis and repressing the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Genetic and pharmacological arguments support an implication of the androgen receptor. Signalling analyses suggest a crosstalk between the androgen receptor and the mTORC1 pathway, possibly via AMPK. In vivo experiments confirm that urolithin B induces muscle hypertrophy in mice and reduces muscle atrophy after the sciatic nerve section. Conclusions This study highlights the potential usefulness of urolithin B for the treatment of muscle mass loss associated with various (pathological) physiological states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据