4.6 Article

ADPase CD39 Fused to Glycoprotein VI-Fc Boosts Local Antithrombotic Effects at Vascular Lesions

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005991

关键词

glycoprotein; platelet; thrombosis

资金

  1. Bavarian Research Foundation (Bayerische Forschungsstiftung) [1145-14]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 1123, TP 08]
  3. University of Tubingen [KFO240]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-GPVI (Glycoprotein VI) is the essential platelet collagen receptor in atherothrombosis. Dimeric GPVI-Fc (Revacept) binds to GPVI binding sites on plaque collagen. As expected, it did not increase bleeding in clinical studies. GPVI-Fc is a potent inhibitor of atherosclerotic plaque-induced platelet aggregation at high shear flow, but its inhibition at low shear flow is limited. We sought to increase the platelet inhibitory potential by fusing GPVI-Fc to the ectonucleotidase CD39 (fusion protein GPVI-CD39), which inhibits local ADP accumulation at vascular plaques, and thus to create a lesion-directed dual antiplatelet therapy that is expected to lack systemic bleeding risks. Methods and Results-GPVI-CD39 effectively stimulated local ADP degradation and, compared with GPVI-Fc alone, led to significantly increased inhibition of ADP-, collagen-, and human plaque-induced platelet aggregation in Multiplate aggregometry and plaque-induced platelet thrombus formation under arterial flow conditions. GPVI-CD39 did not increase bleeding time in an in vitro assay simulating primary hemostasis. In a mouse model of ferric chloride-induced arterial thrombosis, GPVI-CD39 effectively delayed vascular thrombosis but did not increase tail bleeding time in vivo. Conclusions-GPVI-CD39 is a novel approach to increase local antithrombotic activity at sites of atherosclerotic plaque rupture or injury. It enhances GPVI-Fc-mediated platelet inhibition and presents a potentially effective and safe molecule for the treatment of acute atherothrombotic events, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据