4.6 Article

Outcomes of Reoperation After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Implications for Index Repair Strategy

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006376

关键词

aortic dissection; aortic surgery

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health T32 National Research Service Award
  2. Thoracic Surgery Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-The optimal surgical approach for management of acute type A aortic dissection remains controversial. This study aimed to assess outcomes of reoperation after acute type A dissection repair to help guide decision making around index operative strategy. Methods and Results-All aortic reoperations (n=129) at a single referral institution from August 2005 to April 2016 after prior acute type A dissection repair were reviewed. The primary outcome was 30-day or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included organ-specific morbidity and 1-and 5-year outcomes as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The majority of initial reoperations were proximal aortic (aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending) or aortic arch procedures (62.5%, n=55); most initial reoperations were performed in the elective setting (83.1%, n=74). Additional nonstaged second or more reoperations were required in 21 patients (23.6%) after the initial reoperation, during a median follow-up of 2.5 years after the initial reoperation. Thirty-day or in-hospital mortality for all reoperations was 7.0% (elective: 6.3%; nonelective: 11.1%) with acceptable rates of organ-specific morbidity, given the procedural complexity. One-and 5-year overall survival after initial reoperation was 85.9% and 64.9%, respectively, with aorta-specific survival of 88% at 5 years. Conclusions-Reoperation after acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with low rates of mortality and morbidity. These data support more limited index repair for acute type A dissection, especially for patients undergoing index repair in lower volume centers without expertise in extensive repair, because reoperations, if needed, can be performed safely in referral aortic centers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据