4.8 Article

Fracture behaviors of brittle and ductile 2D carbon structures under uniaxial tensile stress

期刊

CARBON
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 486-492

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.021

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21206049, 51472102]
  2. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC-Guangdong Joint Fund
  3. Leading Talents for Zhengzhou Science and Technology Bureau [131PLJRC649]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many novel two-dimensional (2D) allotropes of carbon have been predicted to be (meta)stable at 0 K, however, their thermal stability and mechanical properties at finite temperatures remain unclear. In this study, the mechanical properties and fracture behaviors of five newly predicted monatomic thick carbon sheets (C-31, C-33, delta-graphyne (GY), gamma-GY, C-63, and graphene) are investigated using molecular simulations. The gamma-GY, gamma-GY, and graphene show brittle fractures in uniaxial tension testing at temperatures from 1 to 1200 K. The first signs of fracture in these brittle carbon sheets indicate that the C-C bonds linking the benzene rings and linear acetylenic carbons break with strong directional preference, whereby the direction of the breaking C-C bonds is parallel to the direction of tensile stress. A brittle-to-ductile transition is identified in the C-31, C-33, and C-63 sheets at high temperatures, which corresponds to the breakages of the C-C bonds in the triangular carbon rings. Global and local order-order structural transitions as well as order-disorder transitions are obtained in different ductile carbon sheets, and are found in the same carbon sheet under tensile stress along different directions. These results suggest a strong correlation between the structure and the failure mechanism in 2D carbon sheets, which is of great importance in the future design, synthesis and application of novel 2D materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据