4.7 Article

An Online Convex Optimization Approach to Real-Time Energy Pricing for Demand Response

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 2784-2793

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2539948

关键词

Demand response; online learning; real-time pricing

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1423316, 1442686, 1547347]
  2. Institute of Renewable Energy and the Environment at the University of Minnesota [RL-0010-13]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1423316, 1442686] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1547347] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Real-time price setting strategies are investigated for use by demand response programs in future power grids. The major challenge is that consumers have varying degrees of responsiveness to price adjustments at different time instants, which must be learned and accounted for by demand response initiatives. To this end, an online learning approach is developed here offering strong performance guarantees with minimal assumptions on the dynamics of load levels and consumer elasticity, even when consumers are adversarial and take actions strategically. The developed algorithms can determine electricity prices sequentially so as to elicit desirable usage behavior and flatten load curves, while implicitly learning individual consumers' price elasticity based on available feedback information. Two feedback structures are considered: 1) a full information setup, where aggregate load levels as well as individual price elasticity parameters are directly available, and 2) a partial information (bandit) case, where only the aggregate load levels are revealed. Fairness and sparsity constraints are also incorporated via appropriate regularizers. Numerical tests verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据