4.8 Article

Polymer Coating Materials and Their Fouling Release Activity: A Cheminformatics Approach to Predict Properties

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 1781-1792

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b12766

关键词

polymer coating materials; QSAR; mixture; polysiloxane; antifouling; fouling-release

资金

  1. North Dakota State University Center for Computationally Assisted Science and Technology
  2. Department of Energy [DE-SC0001717]
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-11-1-0032, N00014-12-1-0641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel cheminformatics-based approach has been employed to investigate a set of polymer coating materials designed to mitigate the accumulation of marine biofouling on surfaces immersed in the sea. Specifically, a set of 27 nontoxic, amphiphilic polysiloxane-based polymer coatings was synthesized using a combinatorial, high-throughput approach and characterized for fouling-release (FR) activity toward a number of relevant marine fouling organisms, including bacteria, microalgae, and adult barnacles. In order to model these complex systems adequately, a new computational technique was used in which all investigated polymer-based coating materials were considered as mixture systems comprising several compositional variables at a range of concentrations. By applying a combination of methodologies for mixture systems and a quantitative structure-activity relationship approach (QSAR), seven unique QSAR models were developed that were able to successfully predict the desired FR properties. Furthermore, the developed models identified several significant descriptors responsible for FR activity of investigated polymer-based coating materials, with correlation coefficients ranging from r(test)(2) = 0.63 to 0.94. The computational models derived from this study may serve as a powerful set of tools to predict optimal combinations of source components to produce amphiphilic polysiloxane-based coating systems with effective, broad-spectrum FR properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据