4.7 Article

An adaptive Fixed-Mesh ALE method for free surface flows

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.041

关键词

Embedded mesh; Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian; Cut mesh; Adaptive; Finite element; Free surface

资金

  1. ELASTIC-FLOW project of the Spanish Government [DPI2015-67857-R]
  2. Spanish Government through the Ramon y Cajal grant [RYC-2015-17367]
  3. ICREA Academia Research Program of the Catalan Government
  4. CONICYT (Programa de Formacion de Capital o Humano Avanzado/Becas-Chile) [72120080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work we present a Fixed-Mesh ALE method for the numerical simulation of free surface flows capable of using an adaptive finite element mesh covering a background domain. This mesh is successively refined and unrefined at each time step in order to focus the computational effort on the spatial regions where it is required. Some of the main ingredients of the formulation are the use of an Arbitrary-Lagrangian Eulerian formulation for computing temporal derivatives, the use of stabilization terms for stabilizing convection, stabilizing the lack of compatibility between velocity and pressure interpolation spaces, and stabilizing the ill-conditioning introduced by the cuts on the background finite element mesh, and the coupling of the algorithm with an adaptive mesh refinement procedure suitable for running on distributed memory environments. Algorithmic steps for the projection between meshes are presented together with the algebraic fractional step approach used for improving the condition number of the linear systems to be solved. The method is tested in several numerical examples. The expected convergence rates both in space and time are observed. Smooth solution fields for both velocity and pressure are obtained (as a result of the contribution of the stabilization terms). Finally, a good agreement between the numerical results and the reference experimental data is obtained. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据