4.7 Article

Strategic Honeypot Game Model for Distributed Denial of Service Attacks in the Smart Grid

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 2474-2482

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2017.2670144

关键词

Honeypot; game theory; advanced metering infrastructure; distributed denial of service attack; smart grid

资金

  1. NSFC [61572262, 61533010, 61373135, 61571233, 61532013]
  2. National China 973 Project [2015CB352401]
  3. NSF of Jiangsu Province [BK20141427]
  4. Open Research Fund of the Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (NUPT)
  5. Ministry of Education [NYKL201507]
  6. Qinlan Project of Jiangsu Province
  7. NSFC [61572262, 61533010, 61373135, 61571233, 61532013]
  8. National China 973 Project [2015CB352401]
  9. NSF of Jiangsu Province [BK20141427]
  10. Open Research Fund of the Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network Technology (NUPT)
  11. Ministry of Education [NYKL201507]
  12. Qinlan Project of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) is an important component for a smart grid system to measure, collect, store, analyze, and operate users consumption data. The need of communication and data transmission between consumers (smart meters) and utilities make AMI vulnerable to various attacks. In this paper, we focus on distributed denial of service attack in the AMI network. We introduce honeypots into the AMI network as a decoy system to detect and gather attack information. We analyze the interactions between the attackers and the defenders, and derive optimal strategies for both sides. We further prove the existence of several Bayesian-Nash equilibriums in the honeypot game. Finally, we evaluate our proposals on an AMI testbed in the smart grid, and the results show that our proposed strategy is effective in improving the efficiency of defense with the deployment of honeypots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据