4.5 Article

Defective T-cell control of Epstein-Barr virus infection in multiple sclerosis

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/cti.2016.87

关键词

-

资金

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia
  2. Trish Multiple Sclerosis Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mounting evidence indicates that infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has a major role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Defective elimination of EBV-infected B cells by CD8(+) T cells might cause MS by allowing EBV-infected autoreactive B cells to accumulate in the brain. Here we undertake a comprehensive analysis of the T-cell response to EBV in MS, using flow cytometry and intracellular IFN-gamma staining to measure T-cell responses to EBV-infected autologous lymphoblastoid cell lines and pools of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-class-I-restricted peptides from EBV lytic or latent proteins and cytomegalovirus (CMV), in 95 patients and 56 EBV-seropositive healthy subjects. In 20 HLA-A2(+) healthy subjects and 20 HLA-A2(+) patients we also analysed CD8(+) T cells specific for individual peptides, measured by binding to HLA-peptide complexes and production of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and IL-2. We found a decreased CD8(+) T-cell response to EBV lytic, but not CMV lytic, antigens at the onset of MS and at all subsequent disease stages. CD8(+) T cells directed against EBV latent antigens were increased but had reduced cytokine polyfunctionality indicating T-cell exhaustion. During attacks the EBV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell populations expanded, with increased functionality of latent-specific CD8(+) T cells. With increasing disease duration, EBV-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells progressively declined, consistent with T-cell exhaustion. The anti-EBNA1 IgG titre correlated inversely with the EBV-specific CD8(+) T-cell frequency. We postulate that defective CD8(+) T-cell control of EBV reactivation leads to an expanded population of latently infected cells, including autoreactive B cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据