4.8 Article

High Efficiency Inverted Planar Perovskite Solar Cells with Solution-Processed NiOx Hole Contact

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 2439-2448

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b13372

关键词

undoped nickel oxide; hole-transporting layer; inverted planar structure; perovskite solar cells; high efficiency

资金

  1. NSFC-ISF Research Program - National Natural Science Foundation of China [2015DFG52690]
  2. Joint NSFC-ISF Research Program - Israel Science Foundation [2015DFG52690]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51272126]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NiOx is a promising hole-transporting material for perovskite solar cells due to its high hole mobility, good stability, and easy processability. In this work, we employed a simple solution-processed NiOx film as the hole-transporting layer in perovskite solar cells. When the thickness of the perovskite layer increased from 270 to 380 rim, the light absorption and photogenerated carrier density were enhanced and the transporting distance of electron and hole would also increase at the same time, resulting in a large charge transfer resistance and a long hole-extracted process in the device, characterized by the UV-vis, photoluminescence, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy spectra. Combining both of these factors, an optimal thickness of 334.2 nm was prepared with the perovskite precursor concentration of 1.35 M. Moreover, the optimal device fabrication conditions were further achieved by optimizing the thickness of NiOx hole-transporting layer and PCBM electron selective layer. As a result, the best power conversion efficiency of 15.71% was obtained with a J(sc) of 20.51 mA.cm(-2), a V-oc of 988 mV, and a FF of 77.51% with almost no hysteresis. A stable efficiency of 15.10% was caught at the maximum power point. This work provides a promising route to achieve higher efficiency perovskite solar cells based on NiOx or other inorganic hole-transporting materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据