4.6 Article

Discriminative Dictionary Learning With Two-Level Low Rank and Group Sparse Decomposition for Image Classification

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 3758-3771

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2581861

关键词

Discriminative dictionary learning (DDL); group sparse; image classification; low rank

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61173090, 61072106, 61271302]
  2. National Research Foundation for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130203110009]
  3. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2013CB329402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discriminative dictionary learning (DDL) framework has been widely used in image classification which aims to learn some class-specific feature vectors as well as a representative dictionary according to a set of labeled training samples. However, interclass similarities and intraclass variances among input samples and learned features will generally weaken the representability of dictionary and the discrimination of feature vectors so as to degrade the classification performance. Therefore, how to explicitly represent them becomes an important issue. In this paper, we present a novel DDL framework with two-level low rank and group sparse decomposition model. In the first level, we learn a class-shared and several class-specific dictionaries, where a low rank and a group sparse regularization are, respectively, imposed on the corresponding feature matrices. In the second level, the class-specific feature matrix will be further decomposed into a low rank and a sparse matrix so that intraclass variances can be separated to concentrate the corresponding feature vectors. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Compared with the other state-of-the-arts on several popular image databases, our model can achieve a competitive or better performance in terms of the classification accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据