4.6 Article

Distributed Formation Control of Multiple Quadrotor Aircraft Based on Nonsmooth Consensus Algorithms

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 342-353

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2777463

关键词

Finite-time control; formation control; linear quadratic regulator (LQR); multiple quadrotor aircraft; nonsmooth consensus

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0800401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673153, 61722303, 61673104, 61773216]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20170079]
  4. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61621003]
  5. Australian Research Council [DE180101268]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [JZ2017HGPA0163, 2242016K41030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The problem of distributed formation control for multiple quadrotor aircraft in the form of leader-follower structure is considered in this paper. Based on a nonsmooth back-stepping design, a novel consensus formation control algorithm is proposed and utilized. First, for the position control subsystem, based on the linear quadratic regulator optimal design method, a formation control law for multiple quadrotor aircraft is designed such that the positions of all the quadrotor aircraft converge to the desired formation pattern. The designed formation control law for position systems will generate the desired attitude for the attitude control systems. Second, for the attitude control subsystem described by unit quaternion, by employing the technique of finite-time control and switch control, a global bounded finite-time attitude tracking controller is designed such that the desired attitude can be tracked by the multiple quadrotor aircraft in finite time. Finally, numerical example is performed to demonstrate that all quadrotor aircraft converge to the desired formation pattern in the 3-D-space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据