4.7 Article

Rheological characterization of the structural breakdown process to analyze the stability of flowable mortars under vibration

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 517-525

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.102

关键词

Paste; Mortar; Vibration; Segregation; Rheology; Yield stress; Viscosity; Structural breakdown; Dynamic stability; Interparticle structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of fresh concrete could be evaluated in terms of its ability to maintain adequate stability while showing good flowability and deformability during pumping and casting operations. During such operations, the concrete is exposed to very intense external stresses which usually cause a complete breakdown of the interparticle structure, thereby affecting both the rheological and the stability properties of the mix including the resistance against segregation. Hence, guaranteeing the dynamic stability of concrete, which mainly depends on the interparticle structural strength and the viscosity, is of paramount importance. However, unlike the static stability of concrete where a critical yield stress serves as a stability criterion, there is no theological criterion yet upon which the dynamic stability could be evaluated. In this paper, new rheological measurement and evaluation techniques are introduced with which the yield stress, the viscosity and the interparticle structural strength could be quantified, taking the structural breakdown process into consideration. Moreover, the stability of different mortar compositions was investigated under the influence of vibration in order to assess the effects of the structural breakdown process on the segregation potential. Finally, based on the results of the theological and the stability investigations, a new theology based criteria is introduced with which the dynamic stability of mortars under the influence of vibration could be assessed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据