4.2 Review

How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes

期刊

FIELD METHODS
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 3-22

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X16639015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) [1IP2PI000395-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few empirical studies exist to guide researchers in determining the number of focus groups necessary for a research study. The analyses described here provide foundational evidence to help researchers in this regard. We conducted a thematic analysis of 40 focus groups on health-seeking behaviors of African American men in Durham, North Carolina. Our analyses revealed that more than 80% of all themes were discoverable within two to three focus groups, and 90% were discoverable within three to six focus groups. Three focus groups were also enough to identify all of the most prevalent themes within the data set. These empirically based findings suggest focus group sample sizes that differ from many of the rule of thumb recommendations in the existing literature. We discuss the relative generalizability of our findings to other study contexts, and we highlight some methodological questions about adequate sample sizes for focus group research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据