4.6 Article

Hg2+ Sensor Development Based on (E)-N'-NitrobenzylideneBenzenesulfonohydrazide (NBBSH) Derivatives Fabricated on a Glassy Carbon Electrode with a Nafion Matrix

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 420-431

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.6b00359

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials Research (CEAMR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [CEAMR-SG-3-438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three novel derivatives of (E)-N'-nitrobenzylidene-benzenesulfonohydrazide (NBBSH) were synthesized by a condensation method from nitrobenzaldehyde and benzenesulfonylhydrazine reactants in low to moderate yields, which crystallized in methanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, and ethanol. NBBSH derivatives were totally characterized using various spectroscopic techniques, such as Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1 NMR), and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (C-13 NMR) spectroscopy. The molecular structure of the NBBSH derivates was confirmed by the single crystal X-ray diffraction method and used for potential detection of a selective heavy metal ion, mercury (Hg2+), by a reliable I-V method. A thin coating of NBBSH derivatives was deposited on a glassy carbon electrode (surface area = 0.0316 cm(2)) with a binder (nafion) coating to modify a sensitive and selective Hg2+ sensor with a short response time in phosphate buffer. The modified cationic sensor exhibited enhanced chemical performances, such as higher sensitivity, linear dynamic range, limit of detection (LOD), reproducibility, and long-term stability toward Hg2+. The calibration curve was found to be linear over a wide range of Hg2+ concentrations (100.0 pM-100.0 mM). The sensitivity and LOD were considered to be similar to 949.0 pA mu M(-1)cm(-2) and 10.0 +/- 1.0 pM (S/N = 3), respectively. The sensor was applied to the selective measurement of Hg2+ in spiked water samples to give acceptable and satisfactory results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据