4.7 Article

Method development for assessing the human exposure to organophosphate flame retardants in hair and nails

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 168, 期 -, 页码 692-698

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.006

关键词

Organophosphate flame retardants; Diesters; Hair; Finger nails; Toe nails; Human exposure

资金

  1. [European Union] 7th Framework Programme [316665]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, a new extraction method based on acid digestion and SPE clean-up (Oasis Wax) was developed for measuring four PFR metabolites (i.e. dibutyl phosphate (DBP), diphenyl phosphate (DPhP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl)phosphate (BDCPP) and bis(2-butoxy ethyl) phosphate (BBEP)) in hair and nails. The method optimization was done according to a combinatorial design (Taguchi) where several parameters were efficiently optimized. Precision was lower for hair than for nails (RSD % 18 and 28%). Recoveries were >74%. High DBP levels in procedural blanks were traced back to the use of SPE cartridges. Therefore a new SPE pre-treatment was tested, reducing significantly DBP levels (<1 ng). Levels of the PFR metabolites were measured in scalp hair, finger, and toe nails collected over two months in two volunteers (female and male). DPhP levels were extremely high (in mu g/g range) in both finger and toe nails in the female. BDCPP and BEEP were the minor metabolites detected in nails (average levels of 28-64 ng/g and <2.2-4.1 ng/g, respectively). DPhP was the only metabolite detected in hair (0.23-0.25 ng/g). Results showed that there is a possible contribution from both an external (via deposition) and an internal exposure, however it was not possible to fully understand their extent. Since there were no records of lifestyle and due to the small sample size, the major exposure source could not be addressed here. Nevertheless, there is evidence that hair and nails (finger and toe) might be good indicators of human exposure to PFRs, especially to TPhP. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据