4.4 Article

Inference of the Distribution of Selection Coefficients for New Nonsynonymous Mutations Using Large Samples

期刊

GENETICS
卷 206, 期 1, 页码 345-361

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.197145

关键词

deleterious mutations; diffusion theory; population genetics; site frequency spectrum

资金

  1. Searle Scholars Fellowship
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship in Computational and Molecular Biology
  3. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM-119856]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) has considerable importance in population genetics. To date, estimates of the DFE come from studies using a small number of individuals. Thus, estimates of the proportion of moderately to strongly deleterious new mutations may be unreliable because such variants are unlikely to be segregating in the data. Additionally, the true functional form of the DFE is unknown, and estimates of the DFE differ significantly between studies. Here we present a flexible and computationally tractable method, called Fit partial derivative a partial derivative i, to estimate the DFE of new mutations using the site frequency spectrum from a large number of individuals. We apply our approach to the frequency spectrum of 1300 Europeans from the Exome Sequencing Project ESP6400 data set, 1298 Danes from the LuCamp data set, and 432 Europeans from the 1000 Genomes Project to estimate the DFE of deleterious nonsynonymous mutations. We infer significantly fewer (0.38-0.84 fold) strongly deleterious mutations with selection coefficient |s| > 0.01 and more (1.24-1.43 fold) weakly deleterious mutations with selection coefficient |s| < 0.001 compared to previous estimates. Furthermore, a DFE that is a mixture distribution of a point mass at neutrality plus a gamma distribution fits better than a gamma distribution in two of the three data sets. Our results suggest that nearly neutral forces play a larger role in human evolution than previously thought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据