4.8 Article

Comparison of photocatalytic reaction-induced selective corrosion with photocorrosion: Impact on morphology and stability of Ag-ZnO

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 348-358

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.029

关键词

Ag-ZnO; Photocorrosion; Selective corrosion; Photocatalytic stability

资金

  1. International Sci. & Tech. Cooperation Foundation of Gansu Provincial, China [1504WKCA088, 1304WCGA177]
  2. National Science Foundation for Fostering Talents in Basic Research of National Natural Science Foundation of China [041105, 041106]
  3. National Natural Science Funds of China [51372105]
  4. Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices [23241025]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H06439] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In previous work, the photocatalytic stability during the recycled degradation is employed to evaluate the inhibitory effect of photocorrosion. Then, a significant question arises: is the photocatalytic stability only related to the photocorrosion for zinc oxide (ZnO)? The answer turns out to be no in our work. The phenomenon of photocatalytic reaction-induced selective corrosion of ZnO nanosheets was firstly revealed. It is found that the special corrosion not only needs ultraviolet (UV) light irradiation, but also results from the photocatalytic reaction. Then, the impacts of this special corrosion and photocorrosion on morphology and photocatalytic stability were compared. It is found that the photocatalytic reaction induced selective corrosion shows more mass loss, more selective etching and more decrease of unit mass photocatalytic activity than that of photocorrosion. The results indicate that the special corrosion-induced active face loss rather than the photocorrosion-induced mass loss can be fatal for the photocatalytic stability. Accordingly, a direct and visual confirmation of inhibitory effect of loaded Ag against selective corrosion is revealed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据