4.5 Article

Diagnostic accuracy of rKLO8 versus rK26 ELISAs for screening of canine visceral leishmaniasis

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 133-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.11.021

关键词

Canine visceral leishmaniasis; Serodiagnosis; rKLO8; rK26; DPP rapid test

资金

  1. Brazilian Funding Agency FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)
  2. Brazilian Funding Agency CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  3. LOEWE grants of the state Hessen, Germany [Steinhoff UKGM_42/2012_MR]
  4. Partnerships Program for Education and Training of the Organization of American States (OEA)
  5. Coimbra Group of Brazilian Universities (OEA-GCUB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) represents an important public health issue. Despite numerous diagnostic tests available, CVL diagnosis still needs to be improved to achieve a more accurate detection rate. Recently, rKLO8, a new antigenic protein of Sudanese Leishmania donovani, was studied for the first time in diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis (HVL) and showed good performance. The present study aimed to evaluate serum reactivity to rKLO8 and the reference antigen rK26, and to compare both diagnostic proteins with the combined DPP CVL rapid test and ELISA (EIE-Bio-Manguinhos) confirmatory test, which are both recommended for the diagnosis of CVL in Brazil. Serum samples of dogs were grouped into: (I) DPP/EIE negative (n = 100) and (II) DPP/EIE positive sera (n = 100). Enhanced levels of IgG, mainly IgG2, to both rKLO8 and rK26 were found in group II. Sensitivity was 68% and 77% and specificity was 92% and 91%, for rKLO8 and rK26 antigens, respectively. Moreover, the combination of rKLO8 and rK26 antigens (rKLO8 + rK26) exhibited higher sensitivity (85%) and specificity (93%). Thus, our results show that apart from the improved diagnostic power of rKLO8 in HVL, this new antigen is also suitable for the diagnosis of CVL. Further, the combination of rKLO8 and rK26 antigens increases the diagnostic accuracy of CVL. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据