4.7 Article

Adjuvant Activity Enhanced by Cross-Linked CpG-Oligonucleotides in β-Glucan Nanogel and Its Antitumor Effect

期刊

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 565-573

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00675

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST CREST [15656522]
  2. JSPS [15J09191]
  3. Photon and Quantum Basic Research Coordinated Development Program from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15J09191] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer vaccine has the ability to directly eradicate tumor cells by creating and activating cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). To achieve efficient CTL activity and to induce Th1 responses, it is essential to administer an appropriate adjuvant as well as an antigen. CpG-ODN is known as a ligand of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) and strongly induces Th1 responses. In our previous study, we developed a CpG-ODN delivery system by use of the formation of complexes between ODN and a beta-glucan SPG, denoted as CpG/SPG, and demonstrated that CpG/SPG induces high Th1 responses. In this study, we created a nanogel made from CpG/SPG complexes through DNA DNA hybridization (cross-linked (CL)-CpG). Immunization with CL-CpG induced much stronger antigen-specific Th1 responses in combination with the antigenic protein ovalbumin (OVA) than that with CpG/SPG. Mice preimmunized with CL-CpG and OVA exhibited a long delay in tumor growth and an improved survival rate after tumor inoculation. These immune inductions can be attributed to the improvement of cellular uptake by the combination of increased size and the cluster effect of the beta-glucan recognition site in the nanogel structure. In other words, the particle nature of CL-CpG, instead of the semiflexible rod conformation of CpG/SPG, enhanced the efficacy of a cancer vaccine. The present results indicate that CL-CpG can be used as a potent vaccine adjuvant for the treatment of cancers and infectious diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据