4.7 Article

Setaria Comes of Age: Meeting Report on the Second International Setaria Genetics Conference

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01562

关键词

Setaria; genetic model; agronomically important traits; drought tolerance; inflorescence architecture; C-4 photosynthesis; millet; translational research

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [IOS-1413824]
  2. DDPSC
  3. US Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2014-67012-22269]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0008769]
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008769] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Setaria viridis is an emerging model for cereal and bioenergy grasses because of its short stature, rapid life cycle and expanding genetic and genomic toolkits. Its close phylogenetic relationship with economically important crops such as maize and sorghum positions Setaria as an ideal model system for accelerating discovery and characterization of crop genes that control agronomically important traits. The Second International Setaria Genetics Conference was held on March 6-8, 2017 at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States to discuss recent technological breakthroughs and research directions in Setaria (presentation abstracts can be downloaded at https://www.brutnelllab.org/setaria). Here, we highlight topics presented in the conference including inflorescence architecture, C-4 photosynthesis and abiotic stress. Genetic and genomic toolsets including germplasm, mutant populations, transformation and gene editing technologies are also discussed. Since the last meeting in 2014, the Setaria community has matured greatly in the quality of research being conducted. Outreach and increased communication with maize and other plant communities will allow broader adoption of Setaria as a model system to translate fundamental discovery research to crop improvement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据