4.6 Article

Prevalence of Masked Hypertension Among US Adults With Nonelevated Clinic Blood Pressure

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 185, 期 3, 页码 194-202

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww237

关键词

ambulatory blood pressure; blood pressure; masked hypertension; multiple imputation; prevalence

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [P01- HL047540]
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health [MO1RR10710, UL1-TR000040, UL1-RR024156]
  4. American Heart Association [15SFRN2390002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Masked hypertension (MHT), defined as nonelevated blood pressure (BP) in the clinic setting and elevated BP assessed by ambulatory monitoring, is associated with increased risk of target organ damage, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Currently, no estimate of MHT prevalence exists for the general US population. After pooling data from the Masked Hypertension Study (n = 811), a cross-sectional clinical investigation of systematic differences between clinic BP and ambulatory BP (ABP) in a community sample of employed adults in the New York City metropolitan area (2005-2012), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 2005-2010; n = 9,316), an ongoing nationally representative US survey, we used multiple imputation to impute ABPdefined hypertension status for NHANES participants and estimate MHT prevalence among the 139 million US adults with nonelevated clinic BP, no history of overt cardiovascular disease, and no use of antihypertensive medication. The estimated US prevalence of MHT in 2005-2010 was 12.3% of the adult population (95% confidence interval: 10.0, 14.5)-approximately 17.1 million persons aged >= 21 years. Consistent with prior research, estimated MHT prevalence was higher among older persons, males, and those with prehypertension or diabetes. To our knowledge, this study provides the first estimate of US MHT prevalence-nearly 1 in 8 adults with nonelevated clinic BP-and suggests that millions of US adults may be misclassified as not having hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据