4.7 Article

Human exhalation characterization with the aid of schlieren imaging technique

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 190-199

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.032

关键词

Disease transmission; Schlieren photography; Exhaled airflow; Propagation velocity; Airflow interaction

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014010588, 15CO2041A]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378186]
  3. International S&T Cooperation Program of China (ISTCP) [2010DFB63830]
  4. National Sci-Tech Support Plan [2015BAJ03B00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this paper is to determine the dispersion and distribution characteristics of exhaled airflow for accurate prediction of disease transmission. The development of airflow dynamics of human exhalation was characterized using nonhazardous schlieren photography technique, providing a visualization and quantification of turbulent exhaled airflow from 18 healthy human subjects whilst standing and lying. The flow shape of each breathing pattern was characterized by two angles and averaged values of 18 subjects. Two exhaled air velocities, u(m) and u(p), were measured and compared. The mean peak centerline velocity, u(m) was found to decay correspondingly with increasing horizontal distance x in a form of power function. The mean propagation velocity, u(p) was found to correlate with physiological parameters of human subjects. This was always lower than um at the mouth/nose opening, due to a vortex like airflow in front of a single exhalation cycle. When examining the talking and breathing process between two persons, the potential infectious risk was found to depend on their breathing patterns and spatial distribution of their exhaled air. Our study when combined with information on generation and distributions of pathogens could provide a prediction method and control strategy to minimize infection risk between persons in indoor environments. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据