4.8 Article

Arbitrary-Shaped Graphene-Based Planar Sandwich Supercapacitors on One Substrate with Enhanced Flexibility and Integration

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 2171-2179

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b08435

关键词

graphene; planar supercapacitors; arbitrary shape; printable; flexible; integration

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YBF0100100, 2016YFA0200200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572259]
  3. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [201602737]
  5. DICP [Y5610121T3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emerging smart power source-unitized electronics represent an utmost innovative paradigm requiring dramatic alteration from materials to device assembly and integration. However, traditional power sources with huge bottlenecks on the design and performance cannot keep pace with the revolutionized progress of shape-confirmable integrated circuits. Here, we demonstrate a versatile printable technology to fabricate arbitrary shaped, printable graphene-based planar sandwich super capacitors based on the layer-structured film of electrochemically exfoliated graphene as two electrodes and nanosized graphene oxide (lateral size of 100 nm) as a separator on one substrate. These monolithic planar supercapacitors not only possess arbitrary shapes, e.g., rectangle, hollow-square, A letter, 1 and 2 numbers, circle, and junction-wire shape, but also exhibit outstanding performance (similar to 280 F cm(-3)), excellent flexibility (no capacitance degradation under different bending states), and applicable scalability, which are far beyond those achieved by conventional technologies. More notably, such planar supercapacitors with superior integration can be readily interconnected in parallel and series, without use of metal interconnects and contacts, to modulate the output current and voltage of modular power sources for designable integrated circuits in various shapes and sizes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据