4.6 Article

Generalized joint attribute modeling for biodiversity analysis: median-zero, multivariate, multifarious data

期刊

ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 34-56

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ecm.1241

关键词

categorical data; community structure; composition data; generalized joint attribute model; hierarchical model; joint species distribution model; microbiome data; ordinal data; presence-absence; trait data

类别

资金

  1. Macrosystems Biology
  2. EAGER
  3. LTER programs of the National Science Foundation [NSF-EF-1137364, NSF-EF-1550911]
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Emerging Frontiers [1550911, 1318164] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Emerging Frontiers
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1550907, 1137364] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Probabilistic forecasts of species distribution and abundance require models that accommodate the range of ecological data, including a joint distribution of multiple species based on combinations of continuous and discrete observations, mostly zeros. We develop a generalized joint attribute model (GJAM), a probabilistic framework that readily applies to data that are combinations of presence-absence, ordinal, continuous, discrete, composition, zero-inflated, and censored. It does so as a joint distribution over all species providing inference on sensitivity to input variables, correlations between species on the data scale, prediction, sensitivity analysis, definition of community structure, and missing data imputation. GJAM applications illustrate flexibility to the range of species-abundance data. Applications to forest inventories demonstrate species relationships responding as a community to environmental variables. It shows that the environment can be inverse predicted from the joint distribution of species. Application to microbiome data demonstrates how inverse prediction in the GJAM framework accelerates variable selection, by isolating effects of each input variable's influence across all species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据