4.7 Article

Regulation of Antimicrobial Peptides in Aedes aegypti Aag2 Cells

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3382/fcimb.2017.00022

关键词

insect immunity; innate immunity; antimicrobial peptides; mosquito; regulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81301412, 81422028, 81571975]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of MOST [2013CB911500]
  3. Academy of Medical Sciences
  4. Newton Fund
  5. Janssen Investigator of Tsinghua University
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-NAF1-Cheng] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are an important group of immune effectors that play a role in combating microbial infections in invertebrates. Most of the current information on the regulation of insect AMPs in microbial infection have been gained from Drosophila, and their regulation in other insects are still not completely understood. Here, we generated an AMP induction profile in response to infections with some Gram-negative, -positive bacteria, and fungi in Aedes aegypti embryonic Aag2 cells. Most of the AMP inductions caused by the gram-negative bacteria was controlled by the Immune deficiency (Imd) pathway: nonetheless, Gambicin, an AMP gene discovered only in mosquitoes, was combinatorially regulated by the Imd, Toll and JAK-STAT pathways in the Aag2 cells. Gambicin promoter analyses including specific sequence motif deletions implicated these three pathways in Gambicin activity, as shown by a luciferase assay. Moreover, the recognition between Rel1 (refer to Dif/Dorsal in Drosophila) and STAT and their regulatory sites at the Gambicin promoter site was validated by a super-shift electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Our study provides information that increases our understanding of the regulation of AMPs in response to microbial infections in mosquitoes. And it is a new finding that the A. aegypti AMPs are mainly regulated Imd pathway only, which is quite different from the previous understanding obtained from Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据