4.7 Article

Chemical thermodynamics analysis for in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion of lignite with phosphogypsum for syngas

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 516-522

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.106

关键词

Syngas; Phosphogypsum; In-situ gasification chemical looping; combustion (IG-CLC); Thermodynamics analysis; Lower heating value (LHV); Cold gas efficiency

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Plan (863 of China) [2011AA06A106]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [21666016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphogypsum (PG) is a by-product of wet phosphoric acid, whereas low rank coal-lignite has high moisture and high-sulfur which seriously influence its direct use. As a promising raw material for chemical industry, syngas can be obtained through a properly designed in-situ gasification chemical looping combustion process (IG-CLC). This concept was demonstrated using a thermodynamic software Factsage, by employing PG as oxygen carrier and lignite as fuel under different conditions. The experiments were conducted in laboratory to confirm the theoretical calculations. The results showed that the product of syngas mainly came from solid-solid reaction and gas-solid reaction. Meanwhile, the optimal conditions for syngas production were found to be: the PG/lignite ratio of about 1; reaction temperatures of over 850 degrees C. In addition, water vapor and carbon dioxide were found to have promotive effect on the syngas output. For PG/lignite ratio of 1 and at 850 degrees C, the values for lower heating value (LHV) and cold gas efficiency were higher than 55000.00 kJ/Nm(3) and 63.00%, respectively. Compared with lignite combustion at 900 degrees C, the production of CO and hydrogen was significantly high. Moreover, the results showed that PG is a promising oxygen carrier for syngas production by IG-CLC process. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据