4.6 Article

SNe Ia Keep Memory of Their Progenitor Metallicity

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 836, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5c7e

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; supernovae: general; supernovae: individual (Tycho, Kepler)

资金

  1. PRIN-MIUR grant [20128PCN59]
  2. MINECO-FEDER grant [AYA2015-63588-P]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 1245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ultimate understanding of SNe Ia diversity is one of the most urgent issues to exploit thermonuclear explosions of accreted White Dwarfs (WDs) as cosmological yardsticks. In particular, we investigate the impact of the progenitor system metallicity on the physical and chemical properties of the WD at the explosion epoch. We analyze the evolution of CO WDs through the accretion and simmering phases by using evolutionary models based on time-dependent convective mixing and an extended nuclear network including the most important electron captures, beta decays, and URCA processes. We find that, due to URCA processes and electron-captures, the neutron excess and density at which the thermal runaway occurs are substantially larger than previously claimed. Moreover, we find that the higher the progenitor metallicity, the larger the neutron excess variation during the accretion and simmering phases and the higher the central density and the convective velocity at the explosion. Hence, the simmering phase acts as an amplifier of the differences existing in SNe Ia progenitors. When applying our results to the neutron excess estimated for the Tycho and Kepler young supernova remnants, we derive that the metallicity of the progenitors should be in the range Z = 0.030-0.032, close to the average metallicity value of the thin disk of the Milky Way. As the amount of Ni-56 produced in the explosion depends on the neutron excess and central density at the thermal runaway, our results suggest that the light curve properties depend on the progenitor metallicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据