4.6 Article

Designing and Creating a Synthetic Omega Oxidation Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Enables Production of Medium-Chain α, ω-Dicarboxylic Acids

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02184

关键词

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; cytochrome P450; metabolic engineering; renewable sugar; fatty acids; alpha, omega-dicsarboxylic acids

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31600042]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [14ZCZDSY00066]
  3. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese academy of Sciences [KFJ-SW-STS-165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Medium-chain (C8-C14) alpha, omega-dicarboxylic acids (alpha, omega-DCAs), which have numerous applications as raw materials for producing various commodities and polymers in chemical industry, are mainly produced from chemical or microbial conversion of petroleum-derived alkanes or plant-derived fatty acids at present. Recently, significant attention has been gained to microbial production of medium-chain alpha, omega-DCAs from simple renewable sugars. Here, we designed and created a synthetic omega oxidation pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce C10 and C12 alpha, omega-DCAs from renewable sugars and fatty acids by introducing a heterogeneous cytochrome P450 CYP94C1 and cytochrome reductase ATR1. Furthermore, the deletion of fatty acylCoA synthetase genes FAA1 and FAA4 increased the production of medium-chain alpha, omega-DCAs from 4.690 +/- 0.088 mg/L to 12.177 +/- 0.420 mg/L and enabled the production of C14 and C16 alpha, omega-DCAs at low percentage. But blocking beta-oxidation pathway by deleting fatty-acyl coenzyme A oxidase gene POX1 and overexpressing different thioesterase genes had no significant impact on the production and the composition of alpha, omega-dicarboxylic acids. Overall, our study indicated the potential of microbial production of medium-chain alpha, omega-DCAs from renewable feedstocks using engineered yeast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据