4.7 Article

Parsing Heterogeneity in the Brain Connectivity of Depressed and Healthy Adults During Positive Mood

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 81, 期 4, 页码 347-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023

关键词

Community detection; Depression; fMRI; Neural network connectivity; Positive mood; S-GIMME

资金

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [R21EB015573]
  2. National Institutes of Health [MH074807, MH082998, MH58356, MH58397, MH69618]
  3. Pittsburgh Foundation
  4. Emmerling Fund
  5. National Institutes of Health Career Development Award [K23MH100259]
  6. Alkermes
  7. Shire US Inc
  8. Allergan
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. BristolMyers Squibb Company
  11. Cerecor, Inc
  12. Eli Lilly Co
  13. Forest Laboratories
  14. Gerson Lehrman Group
  15. Fabre-Kramer Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  16. GlaxoSmithKline
  17. Guidepoint Global
  18. H. Lundbeck A/S
  19. MedAvante, Inc.
  20. Merck and Co. Inc.
  21. Moksha8
  22. Naurex, Inc.
  23. Neuronetics, Inc.
  24. Novartis
  25. Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals
  26. Otsuka
  27. Pamlab
  28. LLC
  29. Pfizer
  30. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  31. Trius Therapeutical, Inc.
  32. Takeda

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: There is well-known heterogeneity in affective mechanisms in depression that may extend to positive affect. We used data-driven parsing of neural connectivity to reveal subgroups present across depressed and healthy individuals during positive processing, informing targets for mechanistic intervention. METHODS: Ninety-two individuals (68 depressed patients, 24 never-depressed control subjects) completed a sustained positive mood induction during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Directed functional connectivity paths within a depression-relevant network were characterized using Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME), a method shown to accurately recover the direction and presence of connectivity paths in individual participants. During model selection, individuals were clustered using community detection on neural connectivity estimates. Subgroups were externally tested across multiple levels of analysis. RESULTS: Two connectivity-based subgroups emerged: subgroup A, characterized by weaker connectivity overall, and subgroup B, exhibiting hyperconnectivity (relative to subgroup A), particularly among ventral affective regions. Subgroup predicted diagnostic status (subgroup B contained 81% of patients; 50% of control subjects; chi(2) = 8.6, p = .003) and default mode network connectivity during a separate resting-state task. Among patients, subgroup B members had higher self-reported symptoms, lower sustained positive mood during the induction, and higher negative bias on a reaction-time task. Symptom-based depression subgroups did not predict these external variables. CONCLUSIONS: Neural connectivity-based categorization travels with diagnostic category and is clinically predictive, but not clinically deterministic. Both patients and control subjects showed heterogeneous, and overlapping, profiles. The larger and more severely affected patient subgroup was characterized by ventrally driven hyperconnectivity during positive processing. Data-driven parsing suggests heterogeneous substrates of depression and possible resilience in control subjects in spite of biological overlap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据