4.8 Article

The role of tungsten oxide in the selective hydrogenolysis of glycerol to 1,3-propanediol over Pt/WOx/Al2O3

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 260-272

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.016

关键词

Tungsten oxide; Hydrogenolysis; Glycerol; 1,3-Propanediol; ATR-IR spectroscopy

资金

  1. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
  2. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Spanish MICIN Project) [CTQ2015-64226-C3-2R]
  3. Basque Government (Researcher Training Program of the Department of Education, Universities and Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bi-functional heterogeneous catalysts combining a noble metal with an oxophilic metal (mainly W or Re) were reported to be selective for the C-O hydrogenolysis of glycerol to the high added-value 1,3-propanediol. Despite intensive research work carried out, there is a great deal of controversy about the role of the oxophilic metal. In this work, the hydrogenolysis of glycerol over Pt/WOx/Al2O3 catalysts was studied in real time by in-situ attenuated total reflection infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy. Moreover, ex-situ ATR-IR spectroscopic studies were also used to study the interactions between glycerol and the different catalytic surfaces. The results obtained indicate a stronger adsorption of glycerol through the primary hydroxy group/s when tungsten oxides are grafted onto the gamma-Al2O3 support. The competitive adsorption between the reactant and the main reaction products for the same active sites, and the effect of the hydrogen availability were also studied. The evidences found in this work point out a triple role of tungsten oxide in the reaction, acting as: (i) a strong anchoring site for the primary hydroxy group/s of glycerol, (ii) a supplier of protons, and (iii) a stabilizer of the secondary carbocation. Under the best conditions, a remarkable high yield of 1,3-propanediol of 38.5% was obtained after only 4 h of reaction time. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据