4.4 Article

Threats, rewards, and attention deployment in anxious youth and adults: An eye tracking study

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 121-129

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.004

关键词

Anxiety; Development; Attention allocation; Eye tracking; Pupil dilation; Social and non-social stimuli

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health
  2. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant [PCIG13-GA-2013-618534]
  3. Israel Science Foundation [1377/14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study examines anxiety and age associations with attention allocation and physiological response to threats and rewards. Twenty-two healthy-adults, 20 anxious-adults, 26 healthy-youth, and 19 anxious-youth completed two eye-tracking tasks. In the Visual Scene Task (VST), participants' fixations were recorded while they viewed a central neutral image flanked by two threatening or two rewarding stimuli. In the Negative Words Task (NWT), physiological response was measured by means of pupil diameter change while negative and neutral words were presented. For both tasks, no interaction was found between anxiety and age-group. In the VST, anxious participants avoided the threatening images when groups were collapsed across age. Similarly, adults but not adolescents avoided the threatening images when collapsed across anxiety. No differences were found for rewarding images. In NWT, all subjects demonstrated increase in pupil dilation after word presentation. Only main effect of age emerged with stronger pupil dilation in adults than children. Finally, maximum pupil change was correlated with threat avoidance bias in the scene task. Gaze patterns and pupil dilation show that anxiety and age are associated with attention allocation to threats. The relations between attention and autonomic arousal point to a complex interaction between bottom-up and top-down processes as they relate to attention allocation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据