4.6 Article

Designing optimal mixtures using generalized disjunctive programming: Hull relaxations

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 159, 期 -, 页码 106-130

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2016.08.008

关键词

Mixture design; Generalized Disjunctive Programming; Hull Reformulation; Solubility; Liquid-liquid extraction

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK [EP/J003840/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J003840/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/J003840/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A general modeling framework for mixture design problems, which integrates Generalized Disjunctive Programming (GDP) into the Computer-Aided Mixture/blend Design (CAM(b)D) framework, was recently proposed (S. Jonuzaj, P.T. Akula, P.-M. Kleniati, C.S. Adjiman, 2016. The formulation of optimal mixtures with Generalized Disjunctive Programming: A solvent design case study. AIChE Journal 62, 1616-1633). In this paper we derive Hull Relaxations (HRs) of GDP mixture design problems as an alternative to the big-M (BM) approach presented in this earlier work. We show that in restricted mixture design problems, where the number of components is fixed and their identities and compositions are optimised, BM and HR formulations are identical. For general mixture design problems, where the optimal number of mixture components is also determined, a generic approach is employed to enable the derivation and solution of the HR formulation for problems involving functions that are not defined at zero (e.g., logarithms). The design methodology is applied successfully to two solvent design case studies: the maximization of the solubility of a drug and the separation of acetic acid from water in a liquid-liquid extraction process. Promising solvent mixtures are identified in both case studies. The HR and BM approaches are found to be effective for the formulation and solution of mixture design problems, especially via the general design problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据