4.8 Article

Architecture of TAF11/TAF13/TBP complex suggests novel regulation properties of general transcription factor TFIID

期刊

ELIFE
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.30395

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg Stiftung
  2. Wellcome Trust [10313]
  3. H European Research Council [ERC-2013-340551]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV8-0021-03]
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Research Councils UK
  7. Wellcome Trust [103139/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV8-0021] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L01386X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Cancer Research UK [17506] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Wellcome Trust [103139/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. BBSRC [BB/L01386X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

General transcription factor TFIID is a key component of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation. Human TFIID is a megadalton-sized complex comprising TATA-binding protein (TBP) and 13 TBP-associated factors (TAFs). TBP binds to core promoter DNA, recognizing the TATA-box. We identified a ternary complex formed by TBP and the histone fold (HF) domain containing TFIID subunits TAF11 and TAF13. We demonstrate that TAF11/TAF13 competes for TBP binding with TATA-box DNA, and also with the N-terminal domain of TAF1 previously implicated in TATA-box mimicry. In an integrative approach combining crystal coordinates, biochemical analyses and data from cross-linking mass-spectrometry (CLMS), we determine the architecture of the TAF11/TAF13/TBP complex, revealing TAF11/TAF13 interaction with the DNA binding surface of TBP. We identify a highly conserved C-terminal TBP-interaction domain (CTID) in TAF13, which is essential for supporting cell growth. Our results thus have implications for cellular TFIID assembly and suggest a novel regulatory state for TFIID function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据