4.6 Article

TiO2 Nanowire Arrays on Titanium Substrate as a Novel Binder-free Negative Electrode for Asymmetric Supercapacitor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 197-207

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.135

关键词

Nanowire Arrays; Asymmetric Supercapacitor; TiO2 Nanowire

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406191]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20131333120011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2015203089]
  4. Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program of Higher Education in Hebei Province [BJ2016053]
  5. Youth Independent Project of Yanshan University [13LGA015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To enhance the energy density, a novel asymmetric supercapacitor with a high cell voltage of 2.3 V is firstly assembled with a binder-free TiO2 nanowire arrays (NWAs) electrode as the negative electrode and a home-made porous carbon electrode as the positive electrode. The binder-free TiO2 NWAs electrode anchored on the titanium substrate is prepared via a two step method combining a chemical oxidation (with melamine as soft-template) process with a pyrolysis process. The TiO2 NWAs precursor is obtained via the dissolution of titanium to titania sol and the recrystallization to titania nanowire arrays gel assisted by the melamine. Due to the good electrochenlical stability and the high over-potential for hydrogen evolution, the TiO2 NWAs electrode exhibits ultra-negative potential range in the aqueous electrolyte (0-1.4 V (vs.SCE)), making it ideal for the negative electrode of asymmetric supercapacitor. The as-assembled HMPC/iTiO(2)-NWAs asymmetric supercapacitor exhibits ultrahigh cell voltage (2.3 V) and high volumtric energy density (6.27 mWh cm(-3)). Only one single cell of the asymmetric supercapacitor can light a red light emitting diode (LED) indicator for 10 min, implying its promising practical application. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据