4.7 Article

Ten questions concerning occupant behavior in buildings: The big picture

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 518-530

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.006

关键词

Occupant behavior; Behavior modeling; Building performance; Building simulation; Energy use; Interdisciplinary

资金

  1. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Engineering Research Center Program of the National Science Foundation
  3. Department of Energy under NSF Award [EEC-1041877]
  4. Center for Ultra wide-area Resilient Electric Energy Transmission Networks (CUR-ENT) Industry Partnership Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Occupant behavior has significant impacts on building energy performance and occupant comfort. However, occupant behavior is not well understood and is often oversimplified in the building life cycle, due to its stochastic, diverse, complex, and interdisciplinary nature. The use of simplified methods or tools to quantify the impacts of occupant behavior in building performance simulations significantly contributes to performance gaps between simulated models and actual building energy consumption. Therefore, it is crucial to understand occupant behavior in a comprehensive way, integrating qualitative approaches and data- and model-driven quantitative approaches, and employing appropriate tools to guide the design and operation of low-energy residential and commercial buildings that integrate technological and human dimensions. This paper presents ten questions, highlighting some of the most important issues regarding concepts, applications, and methodologies in occupant behavior research. The proposed questions and answers aim to provide insights into occupant behavior for current and future researchers, designers, and policy makers, and most importantly, to inspire innovative research and applications to increase energy efficiency and reduce energy use in buildings. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据