4.7 Article

Carvacrol modulates voltage-gated sodium channels kinetics in dorsal root ganglia

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 756, 期 -, 页码 22-29

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.007

关键词

Carvacrol; Peripheral neurons; Dorsal root ganglia; Voltage-gated sodium channels; Tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium current

资金

  1. CNPq, Brazil [479764/2012-3, 476411/2013-0, 308007/2013-1]
  2. FAPEMIG, Brazil [APQ-00460-12]
  3. CAPES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that many of plant-derived compounds interact with specific ion channels and thereby modulate many sensing mechanisms, such as nociception. The monoterpenoid carvacrol (5-isopropyl-2-methylphenol) has an anti-nociceptive effect related to a reduction in neuronal excitability and voltage-gated Na+ channels (Na-v) inhibition in peripheral neurons. However, the detailed mechanisms of carvacrol-induced inhibition of neuronal Na-v remain elusive. This study explores the interaction between carvacrol and Na-v in isolated dorsal root ganglia neurons. Carvacrol reduced the total voltage-gated Na+ current and tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na+ current component in a concentration-dependent manner. Carvacrol accelerates current inactivation and induced a negative-shift in voltage-dependence of steady-state fast inactivation in total and TTX-R Na+ current. Furthermore, carvacrol slowed the recovery from inactivation. Carvacrol provoked a leftward shift in both the voltage-dependence of steady-state inactivation and activation of the TTX-R Na+ current component. In addition, carvacrol-induced inhibition of TTX-R Na+ current was enhanced by an increase in stimulation frequency and when neurons were pre-conditioned with long depolarization pulse (5 s at -50 mV). Taken all results together, we herein demonstrated that carvacrol affects Na-v gating properties. The present findings would help to explain the mechanisms underlying the analgesic activity of carvacrol. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据