4.7 Article

Enhanced denitrification at biocathode facilitated with biohydrogen production in a three-chambered bioelectrochemical system (BES) reactor

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 312, 期 -, 页码 360-366

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.152

关键词

Bioelectrochemical system; Three-chambered reactor; Denitrification; Biohydrogen production; High-throughput sequencing

资金

  1. Jiangsu Industry University Cooperation Project [BY2016022-02]
  2. Special S&T Project on Treatment and Control of Water Pollution [2012ZX07101-013-04/007]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508230]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three groups of bioelectrochemical system (BES), including BC, HBC and CHBC, were investigated for denitrification at biohydrogen production facilitated biocathode. It was found nitrate removal efficiency reached 95% during 6 days for the three-chambered CHBC reactor, while 8 and 12 days were required for HBC and BC, respectively. Besides, highest hydrogen content of 52:49% could be obtained at the biohydrogen cathode in CHBC. In addition, power density and coulombic efficiency (CE) of CHBC reached 118.43 mW m(3) and 79.1 +/- 0.2%, respectively, which were better than the other two groups. Resistance indicating electron transfer of CHBC also showed to be the lowest among the three systems. Through Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing, it was found that 5 core genus promoting denitrification got enriched in CHBC, including Simplicispira, Thauera, Thermomonas, Azoarcus and Ottowia, while only 1 core genus was enriched in HBC and BC, respectively, which suggested that the three-chambered BES structure could affect the microbial diversity as well as the community compositions, and then promoted the nitrate reduction. Moreover, as hydrogen consumers featured for nitrate reduction were found to be the most abundant at CHBC biocathode, hydrogenotrophic denitrification at biocathode could be enhanced in the three-chambered BES reactor. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据