4.6 Article

Autophagy-lysosome dysfunction is involved in Aβ deposition in STZ-induced diabetic rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 484-493

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.10.031

关键词

Alzheimer disease; beta-Amyloid deposition; Diabetes mellitus; Autophagy; Lysosome function

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81541022]
  2. Xi'an Science Technology Plan Project [SF1201(5)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

beta-Amyloid (A beta) deposition has a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). Previous studies have indicated that as a risk factor for AD, diabetes mellitus (DM) could induce A beta deposition in the brain, but the mechanism is not fully elucidated. Autophagy-lysosome is a cellular pathway involved in protein and organelle degradation. In the present study, we used streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats to investigate whether autophagy-lysosome is related to A beta 1-42 clearance in DM. We found that DM rats had a longer escape latency and less frequent entry into the target zone than that of the control group (p<0.05) in the Morris water maze test. Meanwhile, hippocampal neuron damage and apoptosis (p<0.05) were found in the DM rats. The A beta(1-42) expression in the hippocampus significantly increased in the DM group compared with the control group (p<0.05). The markers of autophagy, beclin-1 and LC3 II, were increased (p<0.05), whereas LC3 I was decreased (p<0.05), and the ratio of LC3 II / I was increased as the time advanced (p<0.01). LAMP1 and LAMP2, which are the markers of lysosome function, were decreased in the hippocampus of DM rats (p<0.05). The A beta(1-42) deposition was correlated with beclin-1, LC3 II, and LC3 I positively (p<0.05), but with LAMP1 and LAMP2 negatively (p<0.05). These findings indicate that DM activated autophagy, but lysosome function was impaired. Autophagy-lysosome dysfunction may be involved in the A beta deposition in diabetic cognitive impairment. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据