4.7 Article

Maslinic acid promotes synaptogenesis and axon growth via Akt/GSK-3β activation in cerebral ischemia model

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 764, 期 -, 页码 298-305

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.07.028

关键词

Maslinic acid; Cerebral ischemia; Axon; synaptophysin; Akt; GSK-3 beta

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Maslinic acid, a natural pentacyclic triterpene from Olea europaea plants, possesses neuroprotective effects both in vivo and in vitro. However, the mechanism of its action is not well understood. In this study, we investigated the potential effects of maslinic acid on synaptogenesis and axonal regeneration, as well as the possible signal pathway involved in a cerebral ischemia mouse model. Adult male C57BL/6J mice were subjected to 1 h of cerebral ischemia by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Maslinic acid (0.1, 1 and 10 mg/kg) was administered intragastrically 24 h after MCAO once daily for 7 consecutive days. Axonal loss and synaptophysin expression in the ischemic boundary area was evaluated by histological assay. The Akt/GSK-3 beta signal pathway was determined by western blot analysis. Two Akt inhibitors, LY294002 and MK2206, were used to verify the involvement of Akt/GSK-3 beta pathway in maslinic acid-mediated neuroprotection. Maslinic acid significantly prevented axonal damage, promoted axonal regeneration and increased synaptophysin expression 7 days after ischemia. In addition, maslinic acid treatment was shown to enhance Akt activity and promote GsK-3 beta phorsphorylation in stoke mice. The increased neurite outgrowth and synaptophysin expression by maslinic acid treatment was blocked by the Akt inhibitors both in vivo and in vitro.. These findings suggested that maslinic acid promotes synaptogenesis and axonal regeneration by regulating Akt/GSK-3 beta signaling pathway, which may, in turn, provide neuroprotection. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据