4.5 Article

Particulate Air Pollution at Schools: Indoor-Outdoor Relationship and Determinants of Indoor Concentrations

期刊

AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 857-864

出版社

TAIWAN ASSOC AEROSOL RES-TAAR
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0128

关键词

Classrooms; Particulate matter; PM2.5; PM10; Iran

资金

  1. Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
  2. Ramon y Cajal Fellowship [RYC-2012-10995]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the relationship between indoor and outdoor particulate air pollution at primary schools, and identify the determinants of indoor pollution concentrations. The study was conducted in six classrooms within six primary schools in Sari, Northern Iran. Indoor concentrations of particulate matter (PM) with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 mu m (PM10), 2.5 mu m (PM2.5), and 1 mu m (PM1.0) were assessed in classrooms, and outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 on the school playgrounds were monitored simultaneously by using two real-time and portable dust monitors during autumn, winter, and spring, yielding 26 sampling days for each school in total. The highest outdoor and indoor PM2.5 concentrations were found in winter and spring, respectively. The mean indoor PM2.5 concentration (46.9 +/- 32.9 mu g m(-3)) was higher than that measured outdoors (36.8 +/- 33.2 mu g m(-3)). Indoor PM2.5 and PM1.0 were moderately correlated with outdoor PM2.5 concentrations, which was the main determinant for all indoor particulate concentrations, however, a distinct pattern was observed for PM10 and PM2.5 compared to PM1.0. While meteorological variables (i.e., ambient temperature, relative humidity) could predict indoor PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations, the total area of the windows and the number of students in a classroom were predictors for PM1.0 levels. The findings of this study could inform policy makers in implementing evidence-based targeted interventions aimed at reducing air pollution in school settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据